Implementation of Direct Cash Assistance Funds for Excise Products on Tobacco Products (BLT DBHCHT)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61626/jamsostek.v1i2.64Keywords:
social policy implementation, direct cash assistance funds, tobacco exciseAbstract
This study focuses on how the government allocates revenue-sharing funds from tobacco excise to workers in cigarette factories in the form of direct cash assistance. The very large processing of tobacco products should encourage equitable distribution of welfare. The government pays attention to this by making regulations regarding the use of revenue-sharing funds for tobacco products, known as DBHCHT, in the form of direct cash assistance (BLT). BLT DBHCHT is a form of social protection, which is theoretically understood as part of a social policy designed to pay special attention to vulnerable groups by ensuring income security and access to social services for all. This research uses qualitative research methods with a case study approach. The findings in this study include that the implementation so far has gone smoothly, but actually, BLT DBHCHT is the easiest way for the government to be pragmatic, and very short-term. Communication between implementing agencies related to DBHCHT is still limited to formal communication, it has not touched on what the real needs of beneficiaries are.
Downloads
References
Adil, Muhammad and Fajarwaty Kusumawardhani. 2022. “Competency Development of State Civil Apparatus (ASN) of Planning (Planners) in the Meranti Islands Regency.” Jurnal Niara 15(2):195–210.
Arikunto, S. 2010. Metode peneltian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Barrientos, A., and Hulme, D. 2016. Social protection for the poor and poorest: Concepts, policies, and politics. Springer.
Bazzi, S. 2011. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Social Protection in Indonesia: Past Experiences and Lessons for the Future.
Budi, W. 2016. Kebijakan Publik Era Globalisasi. Yogyakarta: CAPS.
Cawley, J., and Ruhm, C. J. 2011. The Economics of Risky Health Behaviors1 (pp. 95– 199). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-53592-4.00003-7
Creswell, J. W., and Poth, C. N. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Fernandya, S., Yuwono, T., & Al-Firdaus, L. K. 2022. ‘’Pengentasan Masalah Sosial Melalui People Centered Development Guna Memaksimalkan Pembangunan Di Indonesia.’’ Reformasi, 12(1): 118–129.
Habibullah, Habibullah. 2017. Perlindungan Sosial Komprehensif di Indonesia. Sosio Informa, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v3i1.492
Ismulyadi, C. B. 2016. “Kapitalisme Suara Hati.” Humanika, Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 16(1):15–21.
Kenchington, D. G., Shohfi, T. D., Smith, J. D., and White, R. M. 2022. “Do sin tax hikes spur cheating in interpersonal exchange?.” Accounting, Organizations and Society, 96, 101281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2021.101281
Leff, B. M. 2021. “Marijuana taxation: theory and practice”. BUL Rev., 101, 915.
Lindgren, M., and Sandberg, J. n.d. Mapping socio-economic disincentives to public health insurance usage among informal sector workers A case study on Lombok, Indonesia.
Martono, N. 2015. Metode Penelitian Sosial: Konsep-konsep Kunci (Sampel halaman). Nanang Martono.
Moleong, L. J. 2021. Metodologi penelitian kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Murti, I. N. S. 2020. “Pengaruh penerapan POJK. Nomor 11/POJK. 03/2020 tentang Stimulus Dampak Covid-19 terhadap Dunia Perbankan.” Jurnal Yustitia, 14(1), 75–80.
Nur, K. K., P, T. E., Yusuf Sanny Analisis Efektifitas, M., Muharamani, A., Nur Kartini, K., Ekawati Permana, T., & Sanny, My. n.d. Analisis Efektifitas Pemungutan Cukai Rokok terhadap Penerimaan Pendapatan Negara.
Ruan, Y. 2021. Promoting Health Equity by Tiered Soda Tax Based on Sugar Content. Food & Drug LJ, 76, 502.
Ruslihardi, M., Ramadhani, A., Wirawati, S., Rahmah, T. A., Kusumawardhani, F., Nasution, R., & Harcini, H. n.d. Submission to Journal of Election and Leadership (JOELS) Neutrality of The State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in Indonesian Elections.
Santoso, R., Pemantauan, P., Undang-Undang, P., Keahlian, B., Ri, D., Setjen, G., Ri Lantai, D., & Subroto, J. J. G. n.d. Dilemma of Tobacco Control Policy in Indonesia. http://www.beacukai.go.id/statistik.html,
Situmorang, C. 2013. Reformasi Jaminan Sosial Di Indonesia" Transformasi BPJS: Indahnya Harapan Pahitnya Kegagalan". Cinta Indonesia.
Suharto, E. 2015. “Peran perlindungan sosial dalam mengatasi kemiskinan di Indonesia: Studi kasus program keluarga harapan.” Sosiohumaniora, 17(1): 21–27.
Utomo, I. S. 2005. Suatu Tinjauan tentang Tenaga Kerja Buruh di Indonesia. The Winners, 6(1): 83. https://doi.org/10.21512/tw.v6i1.528
Veras Soares, F., Ribas, R., & Osorio, R. 2007. Evaluating the Impact of Brazil? s Bolsa Familia: Cash Transfer Programmes in Comparative Perspective. International Policy Centre for Inclusive Growth.
Wakhid, A. A. n.d. Eksistensi konsep birokrasi max weber dalam reformasi birokrasi di indonesia.
Widjaja, M. 2012. Indonesia: in search of placement-support social protection. ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 184–196.
Yani, J. A. n.d. Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Dan R&D. Bandung:
Alfabeta. Ferrari, JR, Jhonson, JL, & McCown, WG (1995).
Procrastination and Task Avoidance: Theory, Research & Treatment. New York: Plenum Press. Yudistira P, Chandra. Diktat Kuliah Psikometri. Fakultas Psikologi Universitas.
Zainol Hasan, and Mahyudi, M. 2020. “Analisis terhadap Pemikiran Ekonomi Kapitalisme Adam Smith.” Istidlal: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Hukum Islam, 4(1): 24–34. https://doi.org/10.35316/istidlal.v4i1.206
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Jamsostek
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
